[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/5] shutdown: Add source information to SHUTDOWN and RESET
Resending because first send didn't get through to some recipients... Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Time to wire up all the call sites that request a shutdown or > reset to use the enum added in the previous patch. > > It would have been less churn to keep the common case with no > arguments as meaning guest-triggered, and only modified the > host-triggered code paths, via a wrapper function, but then we'd > still have to audit that I didn't miss any host-triggered spots; > changing the signature forces us to double-check that I correctly > categorized all callers. > > Since command line options can change whether a guest reset request > causes an actual reset vs. a shutdown, it's easy to also add the > information to reset requests. > > Replay adds a FIXME to preserve the cause across the replay stream, > that will be tackled in the next patch. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ppc parts] > Reviewed-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [SPARC part] [...] > diff --git a/hw/acpi/core.c b/hw/acpi/core.c > index e890a5d..95fcac9 100644 > --- a/hw/acpi/core.c > +++ b/hw/acpi/core.c > @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static void acpi_pm1_cnt_write(ACPIREGS *ar, uint16_t val) > uint16_t sus_typ = (val >> 10) & 7; > switch(sus_typ) { > case 0: /* soft power off */ > - qemu_system_shutdown_request(); > + qemu_system_shutdown_request(SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_GUEST_SHUTDOWN); > break; > case 1: > qemu_system_suspend_request(); > @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static void acpi_pm1_cnt_write(ACPIREGS *ar, uint16_t val) > default: > if (sus_typ == ar->pm1.cnt.s4_val) { /* S4 request */ > qapi_event_send_suspend_disk(&error_abort); > - qemu_system_shutdown_request(); > + qemu_system_shutdown_request(SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_GUEST_SHUTDOWN); I'm fine with using SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_GUEST_SHUTDOWN for suspend, but have you considered SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_GUEST_SUSPEND? > } > break; > } [...] > diff --git a/qmp.c b/qmp.c > index ab74cd7..95949d0 100644 > --- a/qmp.c > +++ b/qmp.c > @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ UuidInfo *qmp_query_uuid(Error **errp) > void qmp_quit(Error **errp) > { > no_shutdown = 0; > - qemu_system_shutdown_request(); > + qemu_system_shutdown_request(SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_HOST_QMP); > } > > void qmp_stop(Error **errp) > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ void qmp_stop(Error **errp) > > void qmp_system_reset(Error **errp) > { > - qemu_system_reset_request(); > + qemu_system_reset_request(SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_HOST_QMP); This is the only place where we pass something other than SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_GUEST_RESET. We could avoid churn the obvious way, but I guess having the churn eases patch review. Okay. > } > > void qmp_system_powerdown(Error **erp) > diff --git a/replay/replay.c b/replay/replay.c > index f810628..604fa4f 100644 > --- a/replay/replay.c > +++ b/replay/replay.c > @@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ bool replay_next_event_is(int event) > switch (replay_state.data_kind) { > case EVENT_SHUTDOWN: > replay_finish_event(); > - qemu_system_shutdown_request(); > + /* FIXME - store actual reason */ > + qemu_system_shutdown_request(SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_HOST_ERROR); The temporary replay breakage is no big deal. Still, can we avoid it by extending replay first, using a dummy value like SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_HOST_ERROR until the real cause becomes available? Not sure it's worth a respin, though. > break; > default: > /* clock, time_t, checkpoint and other events */ [...] Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |