[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 4/9] mm: Scrub memory from idle loop
>>> On 05.05.17 at 17:23, <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/05/2017 10:51 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 05.05.17 at 16:27, <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 05/05/2017 10:14 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>>> On 05.05.17 at 16:10, <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 05.05.17 at 15:42, <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Otoh there's not much to scrub yet until Dom0 had all its memory >>>>>>>>> allocated, and we know which pages truly remain free (wanting >>>>>>>>> what is currently the boot time scrubbing done on them). But that >>>>>>>>> point in time may still be earlier than when we switch to >>>>>>>>> SYS_STATE_active. >>>>>>> IOW I think boot scrubbing could be kicked off as soon as Dom0 >>>>>>> had the bulk of its memory allocated. >>>>>> Since we only are trying to avoid mapcache vcpu override can't we just >>>>>> scrub whenever override is NULL (per-cpu or not)? >>>>> But how do you know? The variable should remain static in >>>>> domain_page.c, so I think we'd instead need a notification to >>>>> the scrubber when it gets set back to NULL. >>> Why not just have in domain_page.c >>> >>> bool mapcache_override() {return override != NULL;} >>> >>> (or appropriate per-cpu variant)? >> And you would mean to permanently poll this? > > We have to permanently poll on/check something. Either it will be local > to page_alloc.c or to domain_page.c. Why can't this be kicked off right after zapping the override (if we go that route in the first place; I think the per-cpu override would be the more seamless approach)? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |