[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: polish __{get,put}_user_{,no}check()
Hi Andrew, On 04/05/17 18:52, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 04/05/17 09:52, Julien Grall wrote:Hi, On 02/05/17 14:23, Jan Beulich wrote:The primary purpose is correcting a latent bug in __get_user_check() (the macro has no active user at present): The access_ok() check should be before the actual access, or else any PV guest could initiate MMIO reads with side effects. Clean up all four macros at once: - all arguments evaluated exactly once - build the "check" flavor using the "nocheck" ones, instead of open coding them - "int" is wide enough for error codes - name local variables without using underscores as prefixes - avoid pointless parentheses - add blanks after commas separating parameters or arguments - consistently use tabs for indentation Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- This corrects the code which would have resulted in an XSA on Xen 4.2 and older, if those were still security supported. For that reason I at least want to explore whether this is a change we want to take for 4.9.Andrew, do you have any opinion to get this patch in Xen 4.9?It should go in. Release-acked-by: Julien grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |