Re: [Xen-devel] QEMU build breakage on ARM against Xen 4.9 caused by libxendevicemodel

[Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:52:07PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:48:38PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:05:33AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > > > I think xencall should be part of the base xen_stable_libs anyway.
> > > 
> > > Yes, you are right. However I noticed that -lxencall needs to come after
> > > -lxendevicemodel. So, I'll have to move -lxendevicemodel before
> > > $xen_stable_libs, see below. I'll merge this patch into "configure:
> > > detect presence of libxendevicemodel", if that's OK.
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/configure b/configure
> > > index 99d6cbc..3133ef8 100755
> > > --- a/configure
> > > +++ b/configure
> > > @@ -1992,7 +1992,7 @@ if test "$xen" != "no" ; then
> > >    else
> > >  
> > >      xen_libs="-lxenstore -lxenctrl -lxenguest"
> > > -    xen_stable_libs="-lxenforeignmemory -lxengnttab -lxenevtchn"
> > > +    xen_stable_libs="-lxencall -lxenforeignmemory -lxengnttab 
> > > -lxenevtchn"
> > >  
> > >      # First we test whether Xen headers and libraries are available.
> > >      # If no, we are done and there is no Xen support.
> > > @@ -2027,9 +2027,9 @@ int main(void) {
> > >    return 0;
> > >  }
> > >  EOF
> > > -        compile_prog "" "$xen_libs $xen_stable_libs -lxendevicemodel"
> > > +        compile_prog "" "$xen_libs -lxendevicemodel $xen_stable_libs"
> > >        then
> > > -      xen_stable_libs="$xen_stable_libs -lxendevicemodel"
> > > +      xen_stable_libs="-lxendevicemodel $xen_stable_libs"
> > >        xen_ctrl_version=40900
> > >        xen=yes
> > >      elif
> > 
> > Hey, now that this patch is merged, xen.git fail to build QEMU. (osstest
> > qemu-mainline branch fail.)
> > 
> > That's because -lxencall is not found because -L$path_to_libxencall is
> > missing in xen.git.
> > 
> > But I've notice something else, libxendevicemodel.so is not linked
> > against libxencall, that might be the root of the issues on arm.
> > (libxenctrl.so is linked against libxencall.)
> > 
> > Thought?
> > 
> > 
> > We probably need this patch in xen:
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/libs/devicemodel/Makefile 
> > b/tools/libs/devicemodel/Makefile
> > index 55626a5049..81fa5a4ac4 100644
> > --- a/tools/libs/devicemodel/Makefile
> > +++ b/tools/libs/devicemodel/Makefile
> > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ libxendevicemodel.so.$(MAJOR): 
> > libxendevicemodel.so.$(MAJOR).$(MINOR)
> >         $(SYMLINK_SHLIB) $< $@
> >  
> >  libxendevicemodel.so.$(MAJOR).$(MINOR): $(PIC_OBJS) libxendevicemodel.map
> > -       $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(PTHREAD_LDFLAGS) -Wl,$(SONAME_LDFLAG) 
> > -Wl,libxendevicemodel.so.$(MAJOR) $(SHLIB_LDFLAGS) -o $@ $(PIC_OBJS) 
> > $(LDLIBS_libxentoollog) $(APPEND_LDFLAGS)
> > +       $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(PTHREAD_LDFLAGS) -Wl,$(SONAME_LDFLAG) 
> > -Wl,libxendevicemodel.so.$(MAJOR) $(SHLIB_LDFLAGS) -o $@ $(PIC_OBJS) 
> > $(LDLIBS_libxentoollog) $(LDLIBS_libxencall) $(APPEND_LDFLAGS)
> >  
> 
> Isn't the dependency already encoded in tools/Rules.mk?

How? Which makefile variable would include -lxencall in the abrove line?

Also ldd libxendevicemodel.so does not list libxencall.so.

-- 
Anthony PERARD

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel