[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/7] x86/traps: Lift all non-entrypoint logic in entry_int82() up into C
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 03:02:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 02.05.17 at 20:05, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/pv/traps.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ > > +/****************************************************************************** > > + * arch/x86/pv/traps.c > > + * > > + * PV low level entry points. > > + * > > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > > + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > > + * (at your option) any later version. > > + * > > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > > + * GNU General Public License for more details. > > + * > > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > > + * along with this program; If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. > > + * > > + * Copyright (c) 2017 Citrix Systems Ltd. > > + */ > > + > > +#include <xen/hypercall.h> > > + > > +#include <asm/apic.h> > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > As expressed before, I disagree to the re-introduction of such > conditionals in x86 code. > I'm curious to know how the COMPAT interface is treated long term. I guess you're of the opinion that we should always have them enabled? Wei. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |