|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 06/10 v2] xen/arm: vpl011: Add vuart ring-buf and evtchn to xenstore
Hi Stefano,
>> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_console.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_console.c
>> index 446e766..ef3bd44 100644
>> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_console.c
>> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_console.c
>> @@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ int libxl_console_exec(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid, int
>> cons_num,
>> case LIBXL_CONSOLE_TYPE_SERIAL:
>> cons_type_s = "serial";
>> break;
>> + case LIBXL_CONSOLE_TYPE_VUART:
>> + cons_type_s = "vuart";
>> + break;
>> default:
>> goto out;
>> }
>> @@ -326,6 +329,13 @@ int libxl__device_console_add(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t
>> domid,
>> flexarray_append(ro_front, GCSPRINTF("%"PRIu32,
>> state->console_port));
>> flexarray_append(ro_front, "ring-ref");
>> flexarray_append(ro_front, GCSPRINTF("%lu", state->console_mfn));
>> + if (state->vuart_enabled)
>> + {
>> + flexarray_append(ro_front, "vuart/0/port");
>> + flexarray_append(ro_front, GCSPRINTF("%"PRIu32,
>> state->vuart_port));
>> + flexarray_append(ro_front, "vuart/0/ring-ref");
>> + flexarray_append(ro_front, GCSPRINTF("%lu", state->vuart_mfn));
>> + }
>
> It looks like you are reusing the libxl__device_console_add call for the
> main PV console for the domain, to also add the vuart nodes to xenstore.
>
> I don't think it is a good idea to mix the two. I suggest to introduce a
> new libxl__device call to introduce the vuart nodes to xenstore, given
> that they have no relantionship with the principal PV console of the
> domain.
>
I have a doubt here. Do I have to create a new console device
(libxl__device) to register the vuart console or can I use the
existing console device (which is used for registering the primary
console) to register the vuart nodes to xenstore?
I suspect that if I try to register with the same console device then
libxl__device_generic_add() may fail as it is already added.
>
>> } else {
>> flexarray_append(front, "state");
>> flexarray_append(front, GCSPRINTF("%d", XenbusStateInitialising));
>> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
>> index 5d914a5..06ff3b7 100644
>> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
>> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
>> @@ -434,6 +434,9 @@ int libxl__build_pre(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid,
>> state->store_port = xc_evtchn_alloc_unbound(ctx->xch, domid,
>> state->store_domid);
>> state->console_port = xc_evtchn_alloc_unbound(ctx->xch, domid,
>> state->console_domid);
>>
>> + if (state->vuart_enabled)
>> + xc_domain_vuart_get_evtchn(ctx->xch, domid, &state->vuart_port);
>> +
>> if (info->type == LIBXL_DOMAIN_TYPE_HVM) {
>> hvm_set_conf_params(ctx->xch, domid, info);
>> #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
>> @@ -788,6 +791,7 @@ int libxl__build_pv(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid,
>> if (xc_dom_translated(dom)) {
>> state->console_mfn = dom->console_pfn;
>> state->store_mfn = dom->xenstore_pfn;
>> + state->vuart_mfn = dom->vuart_pfn;
>> } else {
>> state->console_mfn = xc_dom_p2m(dom, dom->console_pfn);
>> state->store_mfn = xc_dom_p2m(dom, dom->xenstore_pfn);
>
> These two changes to libxl_dom.c probably belong to patch #4
Ok. I will move these changes to the patch#4.
Regards,
Bhupinder
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |