[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] mitigate the per-pCPU blocking list may be too long
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 02:19:22AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 26.04.17 at 02:52, <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Patch 2/4 randomly distritbutes entries (vCPUs) among all oneline >> pCPUs, which can theoretically decrease the maximum of #entry >> in the list by N times. N is #pCPU. > >Why randomly? Shouldn't current list length determine which CPU(s) >to prefer? I thought randomly distribution is simple and also can meet our demand. What you said I think is also ok. How about just choose the CPU which has the shortest list length? I will use this policy in next version. Will you review this version when you have time? or I can prepare and send next version directly? Regarding to the test I do, any other complementary tests do you think are needed to prove that these patches really mitigate the issue? Thanks Chao _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |