[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/pvh: Do not fill kernel's e820 map in init_pvh_bootparams()
On 20/04/17 19:32, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > e820 map is updated with information from the zeropage (i.e. > pvh_bootparams) by default_machine_specific_memory_setup(). > With the way things are done now, we end up with a duplicated > e820 map. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> Thanks, Juergen > --- > This patch is against for-linus-4.12 branch. Since this is not > a critical issue I don't want to submit it to 4.11 at rc8 time > (plus it will require rebasing for-linus-4.12). > > > arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c | 6 ------ > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c > index 331d769..7ce319a9 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c > @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ static void xen_pvh_arch_setup(void) > static void __init init_pvh_bootparams(void) > { > struct xen_memory_map memmap; > - unsigned int i; > int rc; > > memset(&pvh_bootparams, 0, sizeof(pvh_bootparams)); > @@ -60,12 +59,7 @@ static void __init init_pvh_bootparams(void) > sanitize_e820_map(pvh_bootparams.e820_map, > ARRAY_SIZE(pvh_bootparams.e820_map), > &memmap.nr_entries); > - > pvh_bootparams.e820_entries = memmap.nr_entries; > - for (i = 0; i < pvh_bootparams.e820_entries; i++) > - e820_add_region(pvh_bootparams.e820_map[i].addr, > - pvh_bootparams.e820_map[i].size, > - pvh_bootparams.e820_map[i].type); > > pvh_bootparams.hdr.cmd_line_ptr = > pvh_start_info.cmdline_paddr; > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |