Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] x86/vlapic: Don't reset APIC ID when handling INIT signal

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

On 20/04/17 14:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 19.04.17 at 22:22, <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > According to SDM "ADVANCED PROGRAMMABLE INTERRUPT CONTROLLER (APIC) ->
> > "EXTENDED XAPIC (X2APIC)" -> "x2APIC State Transitions", the APIC mode
> > and APIC ID are preserved when handling INIT signal and a reset places
> > APIC to xAPIC mode and APIC base address to 0xFEE00000h (this part
> > is in "Local APIC" -> "Local APIC Status and Location"). So there are
> > two problems in current code:
> > 1. Using reset logic (aka vlapic_reset) to handle INIT signal.
> > 2. Forgetting resetting APIC mode and base address in vlapic_reset()
> >
> > This patch introduces a new function vlapic_do_init() and replaces the
> > wrongly used vlapic_reset(). Also reset APIC mode and APIC base address
> > in vlapic_reset().
> >
> > Note that: LDR is read only in x2APIC mode. Resetting it to zero in x2APIC
> > mode is unreasonable. This patch also doesn't reset LDR when handling INIT
> > signal in x2APIC mode.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>
> > I regard this patch as a bug fix. But I haven't seen issues caused by
> > this bug and am not sure of the existance of such issues. Anyhow Cc
> > Julien and leave the decision to you (Julien and Jan).
> Julien,
>
> I'm slightly in favor of taking it now, but I won't object if you decide
> otherwise.
Chao, can you assess the benefits/risks of having this patch in Xen 4.9?

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel