[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [For Linux 4/4] xen/displif: add ABI for para-virtual display
On 07/04/17 16:02, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > Hi, Julien! > > On 04/07/2017 04:50 PM, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi Oleksandr, >> >> On 07/04/17 09:30, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: >>> +/* >>> + >>> ****************************************************************************** >>> >>> + * Back to front events delivery >>> + >>> ****************************************************************************** >>> >>> + * In order to deliver asynchronous events from back to front a >>> shared page is >>> + * allocated by front and its granted reference propagated to back via >>> + * XenStore entries (evt-ring-ref/evt-event-channel). >>> + * This page has a common header used by both front and back to >>> synchronize >>> + * access and control event's ring buffer, while back being a >>> producer of the >>> + * events and front being a consumer. The rest of the page after the >>> header >>> + * is used for event packets. >>> + * >>> + * Upon reception of an event(s) front may confirm its reception >>> + * for either each event, group of events or none. >>> + */ >>> + >>> +struct xendispl_event_page { >>> + uint32_t in_cons; >>> + uint32_t in_prod; >>> + uint8_t reserved[56]; >>> +}; >>> + >>> +#define XENDISPL_EVENT_PAGE_SIZE 4096 >> >> This will be always the size of a grant (e.g xen page size), right? If >> so, I would prefer if you use XEN_PAGE_SIZE to so we can easily update >> Linux in the case Xen is using a different page size. >> >> Note that the Front-end, Backend and Xen may use different page size, >> so your drivers would need to cope with that. The current approach is >> to always use the page granularity of Xen. >> > Will the following satisfy the requirement? > #define XENDISPL_EVENT_PAGE_SIZE XEN_PAGE_SIZE > >>> +#define XENDISPL_IN_RING_OFFS (sizeof(struct xendispl_event_page)) >>> +#define XENDISPL_IN_RING_SIZE (XENDISPL_EVENT_PAGE_SIZE - >>> XENDISPL_IN_RING_OFFS) >>> +#define XENDISPL_IN_RING_LEN (XENDISPL_IN_RING_SIZE / sizeof(struct >>> xendispl_evt)) >>> +#define XENDISPL_IN_RING(page) \ >>> + ((struct xendispl_evt *)((char *)(page) + XENDISPL_IN_RING_OFFS)) >>> +#define XENDISPL_IN_RING_REF(page, idx) \ >>> + (XENDISPL_IN_RING((page))[(idx) % XENDISPL_IN_RING_LEN]) >>> + >>> +#endif /* __XEN_PUBLIC_IO_DISPLIF_H__ */ >>> + >>> +/* >>> + * Local variables: >>> + * mode: C >>> + * c-file-style: "BSD" >>> + * c-basic-offset: 4 >>> + * tab-width: 4 >>> + * indent-tabs-mode: nil >>> + * End: >>> + */ I believe you'll send V2 due to the XEN_PAGE_SIZE usage? Can you then please remove the editor mode settings block in each header, too? Those are disliked in the Linux tree. Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |