|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 10/36] ARM: GIC: Add checks for NULL pointer pending_irq's
On 07/04/17 20:07, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2017, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> For LPIs the struct pending_irq's are somewhat dynamically allocated and
>> the pointers are stored in a radix tree. While I convinced myself that
>> an invalid LPI number can't make it into the core code, people might be
>> concerned about NULL pointer dereferences.
>> So add checks in some places just to be on the safe side.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
>
> This approach looks fragile: what if we miss one irq_to_pending call? We
> need a way to avoid pending_irq structs being freed when an irq is still
> inflight. Only after an irq is not inflight anymore, a struct
> pending_irq could be freed.
Indeed. I was wondering if a dummy pend_irq could help on the first
step: Upon unmapping, we replace the radix-tree member(s) with this one
reserved instance (per domain), that would avoid the NULL pointer
dereference.
Then we keep the existing pend_irq (array) around until we are sure that
no-one is holding a reference anymore - either by using RCU (although I
think this is problematic because of the rcu_read_lock) or by finding a
definite point in time when no-one can possibly use that pointer
anymore. The pointer usage seems to be very confined, so I am hopeful we
can find such a limit (say: once every VCPU has exited and entered once
or the like).
Does that sound like a possible route?
Cheers,
Andre.
>
>
>> ---
>> xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 4 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
>> index da19130..44c34b1 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
>> @@ -405,6 +405,13 @@ void gic_remove_from_queues(struct vcpu *v, unsigned
>> int virtual_irq)
>> struct pending_irq *p = irq_to_pending(v, virtual_irq);
>> unsigned long flags;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * If an LPIs has been removed meanwhile, it has been cleaned up
>> + * already, so nothing to remove here.
>> + */
>> + if ( !p )
>> + return;
>> +
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
>> if ( !list_empty(&p->lr_queue) )
>> list_del_init(&p->lr_queue);
>> @@ -415,6 +422,10 @@ void gic_raise_inflight_irq(struct vcpu *v, unsigned
>> int virtual_irq)
>> {
>> struct pending_irq *n = irq_to_pending(v, virtual_irq);
>>
>> + /* If an LPI has been removed meanwhile, there is nothing left to
>> raise. */
>> + if ( !n )
>> + return;
>> +
>> ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&v->arch.vgic.lock));
>>
>> if ( list_empty(&n->lr_queue) )
>> @@ -461,7 +472,19 @@ static void gic_update_one_lr(struct vcpu *v, int i)
>>
>> gic_hw_ops->read_lr(i, &lr_val);
>> irq = lr_val.virq;
>> +
>> p = irq_to_pending(v, irq);
>> + /* An LPI might have been unmapped, in which case we just clean up
>> here. */
>> + if ( !p )
>> + {
>> + ASSERT(is_lpi(irq));
>> +
>> + gic_hw_ops->clear_lr(i);
>> + clear_bit(i, &this_cpu(lr_mask));
>> +
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> if ( lr_val.state & GICH_LR_ACTIVE )
>> {
>> set_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ACTIVE, &p->status);
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
>> index 83569b0..b7ee105 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
>> @@ -470,6 +470,10 @@ void vgic_vcpu_inject_irq(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int
>> virq)
>> unsigned long flags;
>> bool running;
>>
>> + /* If an LPI has been removed, there is nothing to inject here. */
>> + if ( !n )
>> + return;
>> +
>> priority = vgic_get_virq_priority(v, virq);
>>
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
>> --
>> 2.9.0
>>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |