Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH v9 1/3] ts-openstack-deploy: Deploy OpenStack on a host with devstack

[Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 05:32:32PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Anthony PERARD writes ("[OSSTEST PATCH v9 1/3] ts-openstack-deploy: Deploy 
> OpenStack on a host with devstack"):
> > This script installs any necessary packages and clones all of the OpenStack
> > trees which are used by devstack to deploy OpenStack.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I found in one of my working trees this diff to this patch:
> 
> > +sub deploy() {
> > +    target_cmd($ho, <<END, 1800);
> > +        cd $builddir/devstack
> > +        ./stack.sh
> > +END
> 
> diff --git a/ts-openstack-deploy b/ts-openstack-deploy
> index 6542da8..85197b0 100755
> --- a/ts-openstack-deploy
> +++ b/ts-openstack-deploy
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ END
>  
>  sub deploy() {
>      target_cmd($ho, <<END, 1800);
> +        set -e
>          cd $builddir/devstack
>          ./stack.sh
>  END
> 
> Who currently has custody of this branch ?  I think I would like you
> to take it back and fold this change in.  When I've sorted out the
> https proxy certificate issue, I'll ask you to rebase onto current
> osstest master.
> 
> Also, it would be worth grepping for other occurrences of target_cmd
> with missing set -e.  (target_cmd_build implies set -e.)
> 
> Would that be OK ?

Yes, that's OK. I'll add the `set -e`s in my branch.

I guess 'target_cmd_root' needs the same treatment.

-- 
Anthony PERARD

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel