[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/4] Xen: add a dummy vIOMMU to create/destroy vIOMMU in Xen
Hi, On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 07:29:15PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote: > From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx> > > Since adding a dynamic sysbus device is forbidden, so choose TYPE_DEVICE > as parent class. > > Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > hw/xen/Makefile.objs | 1 + > hw/xen/xen_viommu.c | 116 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 117 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 hw/xen/xen_viommu.c > > diff --git a/hw/xen/Makefile.objs b/hw/xen/Makefile.objs > index d367094..e37d808 100644 > --- a/hw/xen/Makefile.objs > +++ b/hw/xen/Makefile.objs > @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ common-obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_BACKEND) += xen_backend.o > xen_devconfig.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PCI_PASSTHROUGH) += xen-host-pci-device.o > obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PCI_PASSTHROUGH) += xen_pt.o xen_pt_config_init.o > xen_pt_graphics.o xen_pt_msi.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_XEN) += xen_viommu.o > diff --git a/hw/xen/xen_viommu.c b/hw/xen/xen_viommu.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..9bf9158 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/hw/xen/xen_viommu.c > @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ > +/* > + * Xen virtual IOMMU (virtual VT-D) > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > + * (at your option) any later version. > + > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > + * GNU General Public License for more details. > + > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along > + * with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. > + */ > + > +#include "qemu/osdep.h" > +#include "qemu/error-report.h" > + > +#include "hw/qdev-core.h" > +#include "hw/sysbus.h" > +#include "hw/xen/xen.h" > +#include "hw/xen/xen_backend.h" > + > +#define TYPE_XEN_VIOMMU_DEVICE "xen_viommu" > +#define XEN_VIOMMU_DEVICE(obj) \ > + OBJECT_CHECK(XenVIOMMUState, (obj), TYPE_XEN_VIOMMU_DEVICE) > + > +typedef struct XenVIOMMUState XenVIOMMUState; > + > +struct XenVIOMMUState { > + DeviceState dev; > + uint32_t id; > + uint64_t cap; > + uint64_t base_addr; > +}; > + > +static void xen_viommu_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) > +{ > + int rc; > + uint64_t cap; > + char *dom; > + char viommu_path[1024]; > + XenVIOMMUState *s = XEN_VIOMMU_DEVICE(dev); > + > + s->id = -1; > + > + /* Read vIOMMU attributes from Xenstore. */ > + dom = xs_get_domain_path(xenstore, xen_domid); > + snprintf(viommu_path, sizeof(viommu_path), "%s/viommu", dom); > + rc = xenstore_read_uint64(viommu_path, "base_addr", &s->base_addr); Could these informations (base_addr and cap) be read from the command line instead of via xenstore? Any reason for these informations to be on xenstore? > + if (rc) { > + error_report("Can't get base address of vIOMMU"); I think error_setg should be used instead of error_report. > + exit(1); Also, exit should be remove, and return instead. error_setg would be enough to signal that the device can not work. > + } > + > + rc = xenstore_read_uint64(viommu_path, "cap", &s->cap); > + if (rc) { > + error_report("Can't get capabilities of vIOMMU"); > + exit(1); > + } > + > + rc = xc_viommu_query_cap(xen_xc, xen_domid, &cap); Since xc_viommu_* seems to be new, you should use xendevicemodel_viommu_* instead, also you will need to define a stub for them to be able to compile QEMU against older version of Xen. The patch looks good otherwise. Thanks, -- Anthony PERARD _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |