[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 5/23] Tools/libxc: Add viommu operations in libxc
Tianyu is on vacation this two weeks, so I will try to address some comments on this series. On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:24:03PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: >On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 07:27:05PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote: >> From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> In previous patch, we introduce a common vIOMMU layer. In our design, >> we create/destroy vIOMMU through DMOP interface instead of creating it >> according to a config flag of domain. It makes it is possible >> to create vIOMMU in device model or in tool stack. >> >> The following toolstack code is to add XEN_DMOP_viommu_XXX syscalls: > >Hypercalls, not syscalls. > >> - query capabilities of vIOMMU emulated by Xen >> - create vIOMMU in Xen hypervisor with base address, capability >> - destroy vIOMMU specified by viommu_id >> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> tools/libs/devicemodel/core.c | 69 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> tools/libs/devicemodel/include/xendevicemodel.h | 35 +++++++++++++ >> tools/libs/devicemodel/libxendevicemodel.map | 3 ++ >> tools/libxc/include/xenctrl_compat.h | 5 ++ >> tools/libxc/xc_devicemodel_compat.c | 18 +++++++ >> 5 files changed, 130 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/tools/libs/devicemodel/core.c b/tools/libs/devicemodel/core.c >> index a85cb49..aee1150 100644 >> --- a/tools/libs/devicemodel/core.c >> +++ b/tools/libs/devicemodel/core.c > >Bear in mind that this library is stable, so whatever ends up here can >change in the future. > >This is not saying the following code is problematic. It is just a >general FYI. > >Obviously the toolstack side is going to follow the hypervisor >interface, so I will do a detailed review later. Sure. If the hypervisor interface settles down, we can inform you. > >> +int xendevicemodel_viommu_destroy( >> + xendevicemodel_handle *dmod, domid_t dom, uint32_t viommu_id); >> #endif /* __XEN_TOOLS__ */ >> >> #endif /* XENDEVICEMODEL_H */ >> diff --git a/tools/libs/devicemodel/libxendevicemodel.map >> b/tools/libs/devicemodel/libxendevicemodel.map >> index 45c773e..c2e0968 100644 >> --- a/tools/libs/devicemodel/libxendevicemodel.map >> +++ b/tools/libs/devicemodel/libxendevicemodel.map >> @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ VERS_1.0 { >> xendevicemodel_modified_memory; >> xendevicemodel_set_mem_type; >> xendevicemodel_inject_event; >> + xendevicemodel_viommu_query_cap; >> + xendevicemodel_viommu_create; >> + xendevicemodel_viommu_destroy; >> xendevicemodel_restrict; >> xendevicemodel_close; > >I suppose this series is going to miss 4.9. > >Please add these functions to VERS_1.1. Yes. We will fix this. > >> local: *; /* Do not expose anything by default */ >> diff --git a/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl_compat.h >> b/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl_compat.h >> index 040e7b2..315c45d 100644 >> --- a/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl_compat.h >> +++ b/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl_compat.h >> @@ -164,6 +164,11 @@ int xc_hvm_set_mem_type( >> int xc_hvm_inject_trap( >> xc_interface *xch, domid_t domid, int vcpu, uint8_t vector, >> uint8_t type, uint32_t error_code, uint8_t insn_len, uint64_t cr2); >> +int xc_viommu_query_cap(xc_interface *xch, domid_t dom, uint64_t *cap); >> +int xc_viommu_create( >> + xc_interface *xch, domid_t dom, uint64_t base_addr, uint64_t cap, >> + uint32_t *viommu_id); >> +int xc_viommu_destroy(xc_interface *xch, domid_t dom, uint32_t viommu_id); >> >> #endif /* XC_WANT_COMPAT_DEVICEMODEL_API */ >> >> diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_devicemodel_compat.c >> b/tools/libxc/xc_devicemodel_compat.c >> index e4edeea..62f703a 100644 >> --- a/tools/libxc/xc_devicemodel_compat.c >> +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_devicemodel_compat.c > >I don't think you need to provide compat wrappers for them. They are new >APIs. OK. Got it. Thanks, Chao > >Wei. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |