[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 5/9] x86/pagewalk: Helpers for reserved bit handling
>>> On 24.03.17 at 06:45, <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 23/03/17 18:35, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> Would you prefer ~((uint64_t)_PAGE_PSE_PAT | (_PAGE_PSE_PAT - 1)) or >> ~(_PAGE_PSE_PAT | (_PAGE_PSE_PAT - 1) | 0ULL) > > Wouldn't it be better to just define the _PAGE_PSE bits accordingly? I don't think that's a good idea, since the flags accessors deal with unsigned int quantities (see {get,put}_pte_flags()), and there's no need to promote these to 64 bit operations. Otherwise you'd also have to e.g. ask for _PAGE_NX_BIT to be made 1ULL << 63 instead of its current 1ULL << 23. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |