[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/9] x86/shadow: Drop VALID_GFN()

To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:30:10 +0000
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:30:15 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

At 16:31 +0000 on 16 Mar (1489681897), Andrew Cooper wrote:
> There is only one single user of VALID_GFN().  Inline the macro to remove the
> added layer of indirection in sh_gva_to_gfn()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/9] Fixes to pagetable handling
  - From: Andrew Cooper
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/9] x86/shadow: Drop VALID_GFN()
  - From: Andrew Cooper

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/9] x86/pagewalk: Use pointer syntax for pfec parameter
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] x86/emulate: synchronize LOCKed instruction emulation
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/9] x86/shadow: Drop VALID_GFN()
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 4/9] x86/pagewalk: Clean up guest_supports_* predicates
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.