Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] docs: update dmop.markdown

[Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Cooper
> Sent: 17 March 2017 11:33
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>; Roger Pau Monne
> <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] docs: update dmop.markdown
> 
> On 17/03/17 11:30, Paul Durrant wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> >> Wei Liu
> >> Sent: 17 March 2017 11:02
> >> To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu
> >> <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>; Roger Pau
> Monne
> >> <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] docs: update dmop.markdown
> >>
> >> ... to match the code after the removal of PVHv1.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> As an observation, why do we have C in a design doc like this?
> 

It is there as an illustration of how the hypercall implementation is supposed 
to function. If you prefer pseudo code then I'd have no objection to a patch to 
change this.

  Paul 

> ~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel