[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/21] x86/xen: untangle PV and PVHVM guest support code
On 03/15/2017 05:42 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 14/03/17 18:35, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> Changes since v2: >> - Rebase to 4.11.0-rc1+ >> - XEN_HAVE_PVMMU moved to config XEN_PV [Juergen Gross] >> - .pin_vcpu kept for x86_hyper_xen_hvm to support PVH Dom0 in future >> [Juergen Gross] >> - 'extern' qualifiers dropped from newly introduced function prototypes >> in headers [Juergen Gross] >> - A couple of #includes added to address build issues with different >> configs [kbuild test robot]. >> - Juergen reviewed-bys added (hope they stand with the above mentioned >> changes). > They do. > > In case nobody objects I'll take this series for 4.12. I haven't tried different combinations but the default set (all yes) passed my tests. In the light of 5-level page tables patches the most interesting, I think, would be !CONFIG_XEN_PV. -boris > > > Juergen > >> The series can also be pulled from https://github.com/vittyvk/linux.git >> (xen_pv_hvm_split_v3 branch). >> >> Some patches are known to produce checkpatch.pl WARNINGS and a couple of >> ERRORs, I fixed a few (mostly in _hvm* code I split) and I refrained from >> fixing the rest to make it easier to review. I think that we may leave PV >> code as it is as sooner or later it will go away. >> >> Original description: >> >> I have a long-standing idea to separate PV and PVHVM code in kernel and >> introduce Kconfig options to make it possible to enable the required >> parts only breaking the current 'all or nothing' approach. >> >> Motivation: >> - Xen related x86 code in kernel is rather big and it is unclear which >> parts of it are required for PV, for HVM or for both. With PVH coming >> into picture is becomes even more tangled. It makes it hard to >> understand/audit the code. >> >> - In some case we may want to avoid bloating kernel by supporting Xen >> guests we don't need. In particular, 90% of the code in arch/x86/xen/ is >> required to support PV guests and one may require PVHVM support only. >> >> - PV guests are supposed to go away one day and such code separation would >> help us to get ready. >> >> This series adds XEN_PV Kconfig option and makes it possible to build PV-only >> and PVHVM-only kernels. It also makes it possible to disable Dom0 support. >> >> Some patches are rather big but this is mostly just moving code around, no >> functional changes intended. I smoke tested it with PV-only and PVHVM-only >> builds, booted and did save/restore test. I also tried the newly introduced >> PVHv2 guest, it even worked! >> >> Vitaly Kuznetsov (21): >> x86/xen: separate PV and HVM hypervisors >> x86/xen: globalize have_vcpu_info_placement >> x86/xen: add CONFIG_XEN_PV to Kconfig >> x86/xen: split off enlighten_pvh.c >> x86/xen: split off enlighten_hvm.c >> x86/xen: split off enlighten_pv.c >> x86/xen: split xen_smp_intr_init()/xen_smp_intr_free() >> x86/xen: split xen_smp_prepare_boot_cpu() >> x86/xen: split xen_cpu_die() >> x86/xen: split off smp_hvm.c >> x86/xen: split off smp_pv.c >> x86/xen: split off mmu_hvm.c >> x86/xen: split off mmu_pv.c >> x86/xen: split suspend.c for PV and PVHVM guests >> x86/xen: put setup.c, pmu.c and apic.c under CONFIG_XEN_PV >> x86/xen: define startup_xen for XEN PV only >> x86/xen: create stubs for HVM-only builds in page.h >> xen/balloon: decorate PV-only parts with #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PV >> xen: create xen_create/destroy_contiguous_region() stubs for PVHVM >> only builds >> x86/xen: enable PVHVM-only builds >> x86/xen: rename some PV-only functions in smp_pv.c >> >> arch/x86/include/asm/hypervisor.h | 3 +- >> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/page.h | 25 + >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c | 7 +- >> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 2 +- >> arch/x86/xen/Kconfig | 33 +- >> arch/x86/xen/Makefile | 16 +- >> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 1925 +------------------------ >> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c | 213 +++ >> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c | 1522 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c | 115 ++ >> arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 2776 >> +------------------------------------ >> arch/x86/xen/mmu_hvm.c | 79 ++ >> arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c | 2635 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/x86/xen/pmu.h | 5 + >> arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 517 +------ >> arch/x86/xen/smp.h | 16 + >> arch/x86/xen/smp_hvm.c | 58 + >> arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c | 500 +++++++ >> arch/x86/xen/suspend.c | 54 - >> arch/x86/xen/suspend_hvm.c | 22 + >> arch/x86/xen/suspend_pv.c | 46 + >> arch/x86/xen/xen-head.S | 4 + >> arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h | 23 + >> drivers/xen/balloon.c | 30 +- >> include/xen/xen-ops.h | 14 + >> 25 files changed, 5461 insertions(+), 5179 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/xen/mmu_hvm.c >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/xen/smp_hvm.c >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/xen/suspend_hvm.c >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/xen/suspend_pv.c >> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |