Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 6/7] xen/9pfs: receive responses

[Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 14/03/17 00:50, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Upon receiving a notification from the backend, schedule the
> > p9_xen_response work_struct. p9_xen_response checks if any responses are
> > available, if so, it reads them one by one, calling p9_client_cb to send
> > them up to the 9p layer (p9_client_cb completes the request). Handle the
> > ring following the Xen 9pfs specification.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: jgross@xxxxxxxx
> > CC: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@xxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Ron Minnich <rminnich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: v9fs-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ---
> >  net/9p/trans_xen.c | 55 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/9p/trans_xen.c b/net/9p/trans_xen.c
> > index b40bbcb..1a7eb52 100644
> > --- a/net/9p/trans_xen.c
> > +++ b/net/9p/trans_xen.c
> > @@ -168,6 +168,61 @@ static int p9_xen_request(struct p9_client *client, 
> > struct p9_req_t *p9_req)
> >  
> >  static void p9_xen_response(struct work_struct *work)
> >  {
> > +   struct xen_9pfs_front_priv *priv;
> > +   struct xen_9pfs_dataring *ring;
> > +   RING_IDX cons, prod, masked_cons, masked_prod;
> > +   struct xen_9pfs_header h;
> > +   struct p9_req_t *req;
> > +   int status;
> > +
> > +   ring = container_of(work, struct xen_9pfs_dataring, work);
> > +   priv = ring->priv;
> > +
> > +   while (1) {
> > +           cons = ring->intf->in_cons;
> > +           prod = ring->intf->in_prod;
> > +           virt_rmb();
> > +
> > +           if (xen_9pfs_queued(prod, cons, XEN_9PFS_RING_SIZE) < 
> > sizeof(h)) {
> > +                   notify_remote_via_irq(ring->irq);
> > +                   return;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           masked_prod = xen_9pfs_mask(prod, XEN_9PFS_RING_SIZE);
> > +           masked_cons = xen_9pfs_mask(cons, XEN_9PFS_RING_SIZE);
> > +
> > +           /* First, read just the header */
> > +           xen_9pfs_read_packet(ring->data.in,
> > +                           masked_prod, &masked_cons,
> > +                           XEN_9PFS_RING_SIZE, &h, sizeof(h));
> > +
> > +           req = p9_tag_lookup(priv->client, h.tag);
> > +           if (!req || req->status != REQ_STATUS_SENT) {
> > +                   dev_warn(&priv->dev->dev, "Wrong req tag=%x\n", h.tag);
> > +                   cons += h.size;
> > +                   virt_mb();
> > +                   ring->intf->in_cons = cons;
> > +                   continue;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           memcpy(req->rc, &h, sizeof(h));
> > +           req->rc->offset = 0;
> > +
> > +           masked_cons = xen_9pfs_mask(cons, XEN_9PFS_RING_SIZE);
> > +           /* Then, read the whole packet (including the header) */
> > +           xen_9pfs_read_packet(ring->data.in,
> > +                           masked_prod, &masked_cons,
> > +                           XEN_9PFS_RING_SIZE, req->rc->sdata, h.size);
> 
> Please align the parameters to the same column.

I am one of those heretics that use tabstop=4 :-)
I'll fix this though.


> > +
> > +           virt_mb();
> > +           cons += h.size;
> > +           ring->intf->in_cons = cons;
> > +
> > +           status = (req->status != REQ_STATUS_ERROR) ?
> > +                   REQ_STATUS_RCVD : REQ_STATUS_ERROR;
> > +
> > +           p9_client_cb(priv->client, req, status);
> > +   }
> >  }
> >  
> >  static irqreturn_t xen_9pfs_front_event_handler(int irq, void *r)
> > 
> 
> 
> Juergen
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel