[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/21] x86/xen: untangle PV and PVHVM guest support code
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 03/02/2017 12:53 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> Changes since v1: >> - Patches 1,2 and 3 were split and reordered to avoid adding temporary >> #ifdefs [Juergen Gross] >> - Juergen's R-b added to what is now patches 14 and 15 (patches 4 and 5 >> in v1). Due to re-ordering there are some tiny diffrences but I opted >> for keeping the tag. >> >> Some patches are known to produce checkpatch.pl WARNINGS and a couple of >> ERRORs, I fixed a few (mostly in _hvm* code I split) and I refrained from >> fixing the rest to make it easier to review. I think that we may leave PV >> code as it is as sooner or later it will go away. >> >> Original description: >> >> I have a long-standing idea to separate PV and PVHVM code in kernel and >> introduce Kconfig options to make it possible to enable the required >> parts only breaking the current 'all or nothing' approach. > > I tried applying this to mainline and it failed at some point. Is > there a branch i can pull from? > Sorry for the delayed response, I was on vacation last week. Just pushed this series to github, you can pull it from https://github.com/vittyvk/linux.git (xen_pv_hvm_split_v2 branch) I'll be rebasing and addressing Juergen's and kbuild's comments this week. -- Vitaly _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |