Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm

[Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:42:57AM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/03/17 10:41, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 11:53:52PM +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> >> branch xen-unstable
> >> xenbranch xen-unstable
> >> job test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm
> >> testid xen-boot
> >>
> >> Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
> >> Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
> >> Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git
> >> Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git
> >> Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
> >>
> >> *** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
> >>
> >>   Bug is in tree:  xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
> >>   Bug introduced:  c5b9805bc1f793177779ae342c65fcc201a15a47
> >>   Bug not present: b199c44afa3a0d18d0e968e78a590eb9e69e20ad
> >>   Last fail repro: http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106324/
> >>
> >>
> >>   commit c5b9805bc1f793177779ae342c65fcc201a15a47
> >>   Author: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>   Date:   Wed Feb 22 14:38:06 2017 +0100
> >>
> >>       efi: create new early memory allocator
> > Does anybody know why this still fails? Andrew applied a fix (workaround) 
> > for this yesterday.
>
> Bisection runs from before will still be running.  Also, the fix hasn't

This is what I expected.

> passed staging yet.

Yep, I saw that.

Thanks for update.

Daniel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel