|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 07/24] x86: refactor psr: implement get value flow.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 04:49:22PM +0800, Yi Sun wrote:
> This patch implements get value flow including L3 CAT callback
> function.
>
> It also changes domctl interface to make it more general.
>
> With this patch, 'psr-cat-show' can work for L3 CAT but not for
> L3 code/data which is implemented in patch "x86: refactor psr:
> implement get value flow for CDP.".
>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/domctl.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> xen/arch/x86/psr.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> xen/include/asm-x86/psr.h | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
[...]
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> index 8af59d9..c1afd36 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,9 @@ struct feat_ops {
> /* get_feat_info is used to get feature HW info. */
> bool (*get_feat_info)(const struct feat_node *feat,
> uint32_t data[], unsigned int array_len);
> + /* get_val is used to get feature COS register value. */
> + bool (*get_val)(const struct feat_node *feat, unsigned int cos,
> + enum cbm_type type, uint64_t *val);
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -260,9 +263,22 @@ static bool l3_cat_get_feat_info(const struct feat_node
> *feat,
> return true;
> }
>
> +static bool l3_cat_get_val(const struct feat_node *feat, unsigned int cos,
> + enum cbm_type type, uint64_t *val)
> +{
> + if ( cos > feat->info.l3_cat_info.cos_max )
> + /* Use default value. */
> + cos = 0;
I don't know much, but shouldn't this return false instead of silently
defaulting to 0? This doesn't seem to be what the caller expects.
> +
> + *val = feat->cos_reg_val[cos];
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static const struct feat_ops l3_cat_ops = {
> .get_cos_max = l3_cat_get_cos_max,
> .get_feat_info = l3_cat_get_feat_info,
> + .get_val = l3_cat_get_val,
> };
>
> static void __init parse_psr_bool(char *s, char *value, char *feature,
> @@ -482,12 +498,14 @@ static struct psr_socket_info *get_socket_info(unsigned
> int socket)
> return socket_info + socket;
> }
>
> -int psr_get_info(unsigned int socket, enum cbm_type type,
> - uint32_t data[], unsigned int array_len)
> +static int psr_get(unsigned int socket, enum cbm_type type,
> + uint32_t data[], unsigned int array_len,
> + struct domain *d, uint64_t *val)
> {
> const struct psr_socket_info *info = get_socket_info(socket);
> const struct feat_node *feat;
> enum psr_feat_type feat_type;
> + unsigned int cos;
>
> if ( IS_ERR(info) )
> return PTR_ERR(info);
> @@ -498,6 +516,15 @@ int psr_get_info(unsigned int socket, enum cbm_type type,
> if ( feat->feature != feat_type )
> continue;
>
> + if ( d )
> + {
> + cos = d->arch.psr_cos_ids[socket];
> + if ( feat->ops.get_val(feat, cos, type, val) )
> + return 0;
> + else
No need for the "else" branch here.
Roger.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |