[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 18/19] xen/mce: add support of vLMCE injection to XEN_MC_inject_v2
On 02/22/17 08:59 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 17.02.17 at 07:39, <haozhong.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce.c > > @@ -1510,6 +1510,7 @@ long do_mca(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_mc_t) u_xen_mc) > > { > > const cpumask_t *cpumap; > > cpumask_var_t cmv; > > + int cpu_nr; > > unsigned int (and likely no need for the _nr suffix) > > Or perhaps the local variable isn't needed at all. > I'll inline this variable. > > @@ -1552,6 +1553,21 @@ long do_mca(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_mc_t) > > u_xen_mc) > > send_IPI_mask(cpumap, cmci_apic_vector); > > } > > break; > > + case XEN_MC_INJECT_TYPE_LMCE: > > + if ( !lmce_support ) > > + { > > + ret = x86_mcerr("No LMCE support in platform", -EINVAL); > > + break; > > + } > > + /* ensure at most one CPU is specified */ > > And what use is none at all? Also - comment style (should start with > a capital). > Do you mean the check of empty cpumap? It's checked at the beginning of case XEN_MC_inject_v2. > > + cpu_nr = cpumask_next(cpumask_first(cpumap), cpumap); > > + if ( cpu_nr < nr_cpu_ids ) > > + { > > + ret = x86_mcerr("More than one CPU specified", -EINVAL); > > + break; > > + } > > + on_selected_cpus(cpumap, x86_mc_mceinject, NULL, 1); > > + break; > > default: > > See earlier patch comments regarding blank lines missing here. > I'll add a blank line before the default case. Thanks, Haozhong _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |