[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] locking/mutex, rwsem: Reduce vcpu_is_preempted() calling frequency
As the vcpu_is_preempted() call is pretty costly compared with other checks within mutex_spin_on_owner() and rwsem_spin_on_owner(), they are done at a reduce frequency of once every 256 iterations. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/locking/mutex.c | 5 ++++- kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 6 ++++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c index ad2d9e2..2ece0c4 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c @@ -423,6 +423,7 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, struct mutex_waiter *waiter) { bool ret = true; + int loop = 0; rcu_read_lock(); while (__mutex_owner(lock) == owner) { @@ -436,9 +437,11 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner, /* * Use vcpu_is_preempted to detect lock holder preemption issue. + * As vcpu_is_preempted is more costly to use, it is called at + * a reduced frequencey (once every 256 iterations). */ if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched() || - vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner))) { + (!(++loop & 0xff) && vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner)))) { ret = false; break; } diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c index 2ad8d8d..7a884a6 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c @@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) static noinline bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) { struct task_struct *owner = READ_ONCE(sem->owner); + int loop = 0; if (!rwsem_owner_is_writer(owner)) goto out; @@ -367,10 +368,11 @@ static noinline bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) /* * abort spinning when need_resched or owner is not running or - * owner's cpu is preempted. + * owner's cpu is preempted. The preemption check is done at + * a lower frequencey because of its high cost. */ if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched() || - vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner))) { + (!(++loop & 0xff) && vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner)))) { rcu_read_unlock(); return false; } -- 1.8.3.1 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |