|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5 09/24] x86: refactor psr: set value: assemble features value array.
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 10:51:27AM +0800, Yi Sun wrote:
> On 17-01-31 15:57:26, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > static int assemble_val_array(uint64_t *val,
> > > @@ -550,7 +641,25 @@ static int assemble_val_array(uint64_t *val,
> > > const struct psr_socket_info *info,
> > > unsigned int old_cos)
> > > {
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > + const struct feat_node *feat;
> > > + int ret;
> > > + uint64_t *val_tmp = val;
> > > +
> > > + if ( !val )
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + /* Get all features current values according to old_cos. */
> > > + list_for_each_entry(feat, &info->feat_list, list)
> > > + {
> > > + /* value getting order is same as feature list */
> > > + ret = feat->ops.get_old_val(val_tmp, feat, old_cos);
> >
> > Shouldn't we check ret for negative values?
> > > +
> > > + val_tmp += feat->ops.get_cos_num(feat);
> > > + if ( val_tmp - val > array_len)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> >
> > Perhaps: ENOSPC ?
> >
> > Also this function does do any assembling. It just verifies.
> > Perhaps other patches add extra work here? In which case you may
> > want to mention that in the commit description.
> >
> Array "assembling" is done here. But maybe the "assembling" is not accurate.
> In this function, I want to get all features old values and put them into
> the array according to every feature's position in feature list.
combine?
>
> Do you have more accurate word than "assemble"? Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |