Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] multiboot2 protocol support

[Doug Goldstein <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 1/19/17 3:31 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 18.01.17 at 18:38, <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> What's controversial about it?
> 
> The not insignificant amount of assembly code it adds, when our
> overall goal is to reduce the amount of assembly code. But
> Andrew has meanwhile indicated he's okay for this to go in as is.
> I will want to go over the whole patch once more though before
> committing it.

I completely agree with you on the assembly vs C. I want to follow this
up with some conversions to C but my original goal was to land some
basic multiboot2 support since we've had this series outstanding for
years. I was just trying to help this series move forward and believe we
can do improvements after the fact.

-- 
Doug Goldstein

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel