[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86/emul: Bugfixes to SYSCALL emulation
>>> On 20.12.16 at 13:14, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 20/12/2016 08:22, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 19.12.16 at 17:37, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> What I've been thinking the other day though is: Why >> don't we put the whole SYSCALL emulation into a __XEN__ >> conditional (implying __x86_64__, i.e. allowing the inner ones >> to be removed)? > > This depends on whether we think it is ever realistic to be able to be > able to test things like this in the userspace harness. I am not sure > we realistically can. Well - it's all about register modifications, which we surely could test. But this would be a rather contrived test, the usefulness of which I would question. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |