[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL"): > Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - > FAIL"): > > These leak check failures are because the XSA-195 PoC is somehow causing > > qemu to segfault. I cant explain why, because qemu should be involved > > at all, and it is especially suspicious that it is only older branches > > where this happens. > > As we discussed yesterday, while this may be a real bug, I think it is > not really a _regression_ in the sense that the osstest baseline > version has the same bug. > > I therefore propose to do a force push of 4.4 too. I have now done this. I force pushed this version: osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.4-testing test] 103240: regressions - FAIL"): > flight 103240 xen-4.4-testing real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103240/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 20 xtf/test-hvm32-invlpg~shadow fail REGR. vs. 102521 > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 42 xtf/test-hvm64-invlpg~shadow fail REGR. vs. 102521 > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 31 xtf/test-hvm32pae-invlpg~shadow fail REGR. vs. > 102521 These are expected. > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102521 > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102521 > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102521 > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102521 > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102521 This is the known qemu crash, see above. > test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. > 102521 This test seems to be slightly unreliable. It would be nice to know why but in any case it's not a regression on the Xen 4.4 branch. > version targeted for testing: > xen 149c34a6ea0c6821620554059e85cb89acf0ff8f So pushed this. Later flights have more failures in, which is why I picked this one. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |