Re: [Xen-devel] Xen Project and Xvisor.

[Jason Long <hack3rcon@xxxxxxxxx>]

I guess Xvisor have many other features (such as runtine loadable modules, device tree based Guest, ....) which Xen and KVM do not have.

On Saturday, December 10, 2016 8:30 AM, Jason Long <hack3rcon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It is stopped!!! as you see in the article, The Xvisor compare itself with Xen and KVM and get better rank. I like to know the Xen Project strategy about the future.

On Saturday, December 10, 2016 4:02 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On December 10, 2016 1:24:57 AM EST, Jason Long <hack3rcon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Please look at
>"http://xhypervisor.org/pdf/Embedded_Hypervisor_Xvisor_A_comparative_analysis.pdf".
>

That is all good, but the development on it seems to have stopped (no checking within the last 6 months)?

Anyhow I am still confused what you are asking for? Is it the idea of hosting everything in the hypervisor?
>
>
>On Friday, December 9, 2016 11:30 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
><konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 06:50:03PM +0000, Jason Long wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>> I like to see Xen developer ideas and concerns about "Xvisor"
>hypervisor. Any experiences and compares?
>
>Um (https://github.com/xvisor/xvisor/blob/master/HOSTS), this:
>
>M:    x86_64 Generic
>A:    x86 64-bit
>C:    x86_64
>V:    Intel (http://www.intel.com)
>E:    QEMU (http://qemu.org/)
>G:    Work-In-Progress.
>S:    Work-In-Progress.
>D:    docs/x86/x86_64_generic.txt
>
>As it looks it is geared towards ARM (and only runs on ARM).
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Thanks!



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel