|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] arm/irq: Reorder check in route_irq_to_guest() to avoid 4 layers of "if"
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Oleksandr,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On 06/12/16 17:53, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> > From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Remove one layer of "if" by reordering the check
> > in route_irq_to_guest() to make code more clearer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > xen/arch/arm/irq.c | 18 +++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
> > index 508028b..6d7e44e 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
> > @@ -481,21 +481,17 @@ int route_irq_to_guest(struct domain *d, unsigned int
> > virq,
> > {
> > struct domain *ad = irq_get_domain(desc);
> >
> > - if ( d == ad )
> > - {
> > - if ( irq_get_guest_info(desc)->virq != virq )
> > - {
> > - printk(XENLOG_G_ERR
> > - "d%u: IRQ %u is already assigned to vIRQ %u\n",
> > - d->domain_id, irq,
> > irq_get_guest_info(desc)->virq);
> > - retval = -EBUSY;
> > - }
> > - }
> > - else
> > + if ( d != ad )
> > {
> > printk(XENLOG_G_ERR "IRQ %u is already used by domain
> > %u\n",
> > irq, ad->domain_id);
> > retval = -EBUSY;
> > + } else if ( irq_get_guest_info(desc)->virq != virq )
>
> In Xen coding style the } and else if should be in separate line. E.g
>
> }
> else if ( ... )
>
> With that fixed:
>
> Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
>
> Stefano, would you be happy to fix this minor coding style issue while
> committing?
done
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |