[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 10/24] x86/emul: Always use fault semantics for software events
>>> On 30.11.16 at 14:50, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > @@ -1242,27 +1242,38 @@ static void svm_inject_event(const struct x86_event > *event) > eventinj.fields.v = 1; > eventinj.fields.vector = _event.vector; > > - /* Refer to AMD Vol 2: System Programming, 15.20 Event Injection. */ > + /* > + * Refer to AMD Vol 2: System Programming, 15.20 Event Injection. > + * > + * On hardware lacking NextRIP support, and all hardware in the case of > + * icebp, software events with trap semantics need emulating, so %eip in > + * the trap frame points after the instruction. > + * > + * The x86 emulator (if requested by the x86_swint_emulate_* choice) will > + * have performed checks such as presence/dpl/etc and believes that the > + * event injection will succeed without faulting. > + * > + * The x86 emulator will always provide fault semantics for software > + * events, with _trap.insn_len set appropriately. If the injection > + * requires emulation, move %eip forwards at this point. > + */ > switch ( _event.type ) > { > case X86_EVENTTYPE_SW_INTERRUPT: /* int $n */ > - /* > - * Software interrupts (type 4) cannot be properly injected if the > - * processor doesn't support NextRIP. Without NextRIP, the emulator > - * will have performed DPL and presence checks for us, and will have > - * moved eip forward if appropriate. > - */ > if ( cpu_has_svm_nrips ) > vmcb->nextrip = regs->eip + _event.insn_len; > + else > + regs->eip += _event.insn_len; Please use ->rip here and below (and perhaps also in the comment). > eventinj.fields.type = X86_EVENTTYPE_SW_INTERRUPT; > break; > > case X86_EVENTTYPE_PRI_SW_EXCEPTION: /* icebp */ > /* > - * icebp's injection must always be emulated. Software injection > help > - * in x86_emulate has moved eip forward, but NextRIP (if used) still > - * needs setting or execution will resume from 0. > + * icebp's injection must always be emulated, as hardware does not > + * special case HW_EXCEPTION with vector 1 (#DB) as having trap > + * semantics. > */ > + regs->eip += _event.insn_len; > if ( cpu_has_svm_nrips ) > vmcb->nextrip = regs->eip; > eventinj.fields.type = X86_EVENTTYPE_HW_EXCEPTION; > @@ -1270,16 +1281,13 @@ static void svm_inject_event(const struct x86_event > *event) > > case X86_EVENTTYPE_SW_EXCEPTION: /* int3, into */ > /* > - * The AMD manual states that .type=3 (HW exception), .vector=3 or 4, > - * will perform DPL checks. Experimentally, DPL and presence checks > - * are indeed performed, even without NextRIP support. > - * > - * However without NextRIP support, the event injection still needs > - * fully emulating to get the correct eip in the trap frame, yet get > - * the correct faulting eip should a fault occur. > + * Hardware special cases HW_EXCEPTION with vectors 3 and 4 as having > + * trap semantics, and will perform DPL checks. > */ > if ( cpu_has_svm_nrips ) > vmcb->nextrip = regs->eip + _event.insn_len; > + else > + regs->eip += _event.insn_len; > eventinj.fields.type = X86_EVENTTYPE_HW_EXCEPTION; > break; By moving the adding to reg->rip here, you bypass x86_emulate()'s zeroing of the upper 32 bits outside of 64-bit mode, so you now need to replicate it below here. > --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c > @@ -1694,8 +1694,6 @@ static int inject_swint(enum x86_swint_type type, > goto raise_exn; > } > } > - > - ctxt->regs->eip += insn_len; > } > > rc = ops->inject_sw_interrupt(type, vector, insn_len, ctxt); I think for the patch description to be correct, this call's return value needs to be altered, for inject_swint() to return EXCEPTION when OKAY comes back here (which iirc you do in a later patch when you eliminate this hook). > --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h > @@ -64,7 +64,13 @@ enum x86_swint_type { > x86_swint_int, /* 0xcd $n */ > }; > > -/* How much help is required with software event injection? */ > +/* > + * How much help is required with software event injection? > + * > + * All software events return from x86_emulate() with X86EMUL_EXCEPTION and > + * fault-like semantics. This just controls whether the emulator performs > + * presence/dpl/etc checks and possibly raises excepions instead. exceptions Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |