|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 10/24] x86/emul: Always use fault semantics for software events
>>> On 30.11.16 at 14:50, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -1242,27 +1242,38 @@ static void svm_inject_event(const struct x86_event
> *event)
> eventinj.fields.v = 1;
> eventinj.fields.vector = _event.vector;
>
> - /* Refer to AMD Vol 2: System Programming, 15.20 Event Injection. */
> + /*
> + * Refer to AMD Vol 2: System Programming, 15.20 Event Injection.
> + *
> + * On hardware lacking NextRIP support, and all hardware in the case of
> + * icebp, software events with trap semantics need emulating, so %eip in
> + * the trap frame points after the instruction.
> + *
> + * The x86 emulator (if requested by the x86_swint_emulate_* choice) will
> + * have performed checks such as presence/dpl/etc and believes that the
> + * event injection will succeed without faulting.
> + *
> + * The x86 emulator will always provide fault semantics for software
> + * events, with _trap.insn_len set appropriately. If the injection
> + * requires emulation, move %eip forwards at this point.
> + */
> switch ( _event.type )
> {
> case X86_EVENTTYPE_SW_INTERRUPT: /* int $n */
> - /*
> - * Software interrupts (type 4) cannot be properly injected if the
> - * processor doesn't support NextRIP. Without NextRIP, the emulator
> - * will have performed DPL and presence checks for us, and will have
> - * moved eip forward if appropriate.
> - */
> if ( cpu_has_svm_nrips )
> vmcb->nextrip = regs->eip + _event.insn_len;
> + else
> + regs->eip += _event.insn_len;
Please use ->rip here and below (and perhaps also in the comment).
> eventinj.fields.type = X86_EVENTTYPE_SW_INTERRUPT;
> break;
>
> case X86_EVENTTYPE_PRI_SW_EXCEPTION: /* icebp */
> /*
> - * icebp's injection must always be emulated. Software injection
> help
> - * in x86_emulate has moved eip forward, but NextRIP (if used) still
> - * needs setting or execution will resume from 0.
> + * icebp's injection must always be emulated, as hardware does not
> + * special case HW_EXCEPTION with vector 1 (#DB) as having trap
> + * semantics.
> */
> + regs->eip += _event.insn_len;
> if ( cpu_has_svm_nrips )
> vmcb->nextrip = regs->eip;
> eventinj.fields.type = X86_EVENTTYPE_HW_EXCEPTION;
> @@ -1270,16 +1281,13 @@ static void svm_inject_event(const struct x86_event
> *event)
>
> case X86_EVENTTYPE_SW_EXCEPTION: /* int3, into */
> /*
> - * The AMD manual states that .type=3 (HW exception), .vector=3 or 4,
> - * will perform DPL checks. Experimentally, DPL and presence checks
> - * are indeed performed, even without NextRIP support.
> - *
> - * However without NextRIP support, the event injection still needs
> - * fully emulating to get the correct eip in the trap frame, yet get
> - * the correct faulting eip should a fault occur.
> + * Hardware special cases HW_EXCEPTION with vectors 3 and 4 as having
> + * trap semantics, and will perform DPL checks.
> */
> if ( cpu_has_svm_nrips )
> vmcb->nextrip = regs->eip + _event.insn_len;
> + else
> + regs->eip += _event.insn_len;
> eventinj.fields.type = X86_EVENTTYPE_HW_EXCEPTION;
> break;
By moving the adding to reg->rip here, you bypass x86_emulate()'s
zeroing of the upper 32 bits outside of 64-bit mode, so you now need
to replicate it below here.
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
> @@ -1694,8 +1694,6 @@ static int inject_swint(enum x86_swint_type type,
> goto raise_exn;
> }
> }
> -
> - ctxt->regs->eip += insn_len;
> }
>
> rc = ops->inject_sw_interrupt(type, vector, insn_len, ctxt);
I think for the patch description to be correct, this call's return value
needs to be altered, for inject_swint() to return EXCEPTION when
OKAY comes back here (which iirc you do in a later patch when you
eliminate this hook).
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h
> @@ -64,7 +64,13 @@ enum x86_swint_type {
> x86_swint_int, /* 0xcd $n */
> };
>
> -/* How much help is required with software event injection? */
> +/*
> + * How much help is required with software event injection?
> + *
> + * All software events return from x86_emulate() with X86EMUL_EXCEPTION and
> + * fault-like semantics. This just controls whether the emulator performs
> + * presence/dpl/etc checks and possibly raises excepions instead.
exceptions
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |