[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] arm/acpi: hide watchdog timer in GTDT table for dom0
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, Shanker Donthineni wrote: > Either we have to hide the watchdog timer section in GTDT or emulate > watchdog timer block for dom0. Otherwise, system gets panic when > dom0 accesses its MMIO registers. The current XEN doesn't support > virtualization of watchdog timer, so hide the watchdog timer section > for dom0. > > Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for the patch, it looks good. Just a couple of questions below. > xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > xen/include/asm-arm/acpi.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > index e8a400c..611c803 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > @@ -1668,6 +1668,8 @@ static int acpi_create_xsdt(struct domain *d, struct > membank tbl_add[]) > ACPI_SIG_FADT, tbl_add[TBL_FADT].start); > acpi_xsdt_modify_entry(xsdt->table_offset_entry, entry_count, > ACPI_SIG_MADT, tbl_add[TBL_MADT].start); > + acpi_xsdt_modify_entry(xsdt->table_offset_entry, entry_count, > + ACPI_SIG_GTDT, tbl_add[TBL_GTDT].start); > xsdt->table_offset_entry[entry_count] = tbl_add[TBL_STAO].start; > > xsdt->header.length = table_size; > @@ -1718,6 +1720,41 @@ static int acpi_create_stao(struct domain *d, struct > membank tbl_add[]) > return 0; > } > > +static int acpi_create_gtdt(struct domain *d, struct membank tbl_add[]) > +{ > + struct acpi_table_header *table = NULL; > + struct acpi_table_gtdt *gtdt = NULL; > + u32 table_size = sizeof(struct acpi_table_gtdt); > + u32 offset = acpi_get_table_offset(tbl_add, TBL_GTDT); > + acpi_status status; > + u8 *base_ptr, checksum; > + > + status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_GTDT, 0, &table); > + > + if ( ACPI_FAILURE(status) ) > + { > + const char *msg = acpi_format_exception(status); > + > + printk("Failed to get GTDT table, %s\n", msg); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + base_ptr = d->arch.efi_acpi_table + offset; > + ACPI_MEMCPY(base_ptr, table, sizeof(struct acpi_table_gtdt)); Use table_size > + gtdt = (struct acpi_table_gtdt *)base_ptr; > + gtdt->header.length = table_size; > + gtdt->platform_timer_count = 0; > + gtdt->platform_timer_offset = table_size; Why table_size instead of 0? Is that the expected values when the array is empty? > + checksum = acpi_tb_checksum(ACPI_CAST_PTR(u8, gtdt), table_size); > + gtdt->header.checksum -= checksum; > + > + tbl_add[TBL_GTDT].start = d->arch.efi_acpi_gpa + offset; > + tbl_add[TBL_GTDT].size = table_size; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int acpi_create_madt(struct domain *d, struct membank tbl_add[]) > { > struct acpi_table_header *table = NULL; > @@ -1909,6 +1946,10 @@ static int prepare_acpi(struct domain *d, struct > kernel_info *kinfo) > if ( rc != 0 ) > return rc; > > + rc = acpi_create_gtdt(d, tbl_add); > + if ( rc != 0 ) > + return rc; > + > rc = acpi_create_xsdt(d, tbl_add); > if ( rc != 0 ) > return rc; > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/acpi.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/acpi.h > index 9f954d3..214511c 100644 > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/acpi.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/acpi.h > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ typedef enum { > TBL_FADT, > TBL_MADT, > TBL_STAO, > + TBL_GTDT, > TBL_XSDT, > TBL_RSDP, > TBL_EFIT, _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |