[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] arm64: Approach for DT based NUMA and issues
Hi Dario, On 27/11/2016 01:01, Dario Faggioli wrote: On Sat, 2016-11-26 at 12:29 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote:4) Generating memory nodes for DOM0 --------------------------------------------------------- Linux kernel device drivers that uses devm_zalloc(), tries to allocate memory from local memory node. So Dom0 needs to have memory allocated on all the available nodes of the system.So, first of all, I know next to nothing about ARM, NUMA or non-NUMA. That being said, providing a guest with a NUMA layout is what we call "virtual NUMA" (vNUMA). It is implemented (although it still has some issues) for x86 already (so you can have a look), but only for DomU. I agree that we need to support vNUMA for Dom0 sooner rather than later, and I agree that Dom0 is a bit special, so some tricks may be necessary. But until we don't implement vNUMA for Dom0, Dom0 is just a non-NUMA virtual machine, and the kernel running inside that should just behave like it behaves on a non-NUMA box. Again, I don't know much about ARM, but I think that, until we don't have vNUMA for Dom0, that devm_zalloc() thing will just see 1 and only 1 NUMA node from which to allocate memory. I would rather divide the NUMA work for ARM in 2 distinct tasks: - Make Xen NUMA-aware - Make DOM0 NUMA-awareVijay, if I understood correctly what Dario said, on x86 DOM0 is not yet NUMA-aware. Aside performance improvement, will there be any technical problem (such as PCI devices will not work) if we don't expose NUMA to DOM0 from the beginning? That being said, and for what it's worth...Ex: SMMU driver of device on node 1 tries to allocate memory on node 1. ISSUE: - Dom0's memory should be split across all the available memory nodes of the system and memory nodes should be generated accordingly....This is the default behavior, at least on x86. Are you speaking about the command line parameter dom0_nodes? - Memory DT node generated by Xen for Dom0 should populate numa- node-id information.Generating DT nodes for Dom0 is exactly what I mean when I say "implementing / enabling vNUMA for Dom0" (in this case on ARM). So, yes, let's do it, but let's discuss how to do it properly (e.g., if there's anything that can be common between archs, such as some bits of the interface). I would expect vNUMA for Dom0 to be common between x86 and ARM. Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |