[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [DRAFT RFC] PVHv2 interaction with physical devices

To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 03:43:37 -0700
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kelly <Kelly.Zytaruk@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>, PaulDurrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:43:57 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

>>> On 16.11.16 at 17:42, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I assume that temporary limiting PVHv2 Dom0 support to systems with 1 IO APIC 
> only is not going to be accepted, right?

Well, as long as it's experimental (and the respective code clearly
marked with fixme annotations) that would be acceptable imo.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [DRAFT RFC] PVHv2 interaction with physical devices
  - From: Roger Pau Monné
- Re: [Xen-devel] [DRAFT RFC] PVHv2 interaction with physical devices
  - From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] [DRAFT RFC] PVHv2 interaction with physical devices
  - From: Roger Pau Monné
- Re: [Xen-devel] [DRAFT RFC] PVHv2 interaction with physical devices
  - From: Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [DRAFT RFC] PVHv2 interaction with physical devices
  - From: Roger Pau Monné

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PULL 0/1] tags/xen-20161108-tag
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [DRAFT RFC] PVHv2 interaction with physical devices
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [DRAFT RFC] PVHv2 interaction with physical devices
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [DRAFT RFC] PVHv2 interaction with physical devices
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.