[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND] xen/gntdev: Grant maps should not be subject to NUMA balancing

To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:42:26 +0100
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:42:43 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On Thu, Nov 10, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:

> Is this something new? Because this patch has been there for a year.

It was just tested now, cycling through all the combinations for a
disk=[]. Removing "direct-is-save" will use different code paths and the
error is not seen.

Olaf

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND] xen/gntdev: Grant maps should not be subject to NUMA balancing
  - From: Boris Ostrovsky

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND] xen/gntdev: Grant maps should not be subject to NUMA balancing
  - From: Olaf Hering
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND] xen/gntdev: Grant maps should not be subject to NUMA balancing
  - From: Boris Ostrovsky

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [DRAFT RFC] PVHv2 interaction with physical devices
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] libxl: fix gentypes call in Makefile
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND] xen/gntdev: Grant maps should not be subject to NUMA balancing
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND] xen/gntdev: Grant maps should not be subject to NUMA balancing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.