[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen on Qualcomm



Hi Julien/Sameer,

Do you have any updates on this? Your help on my specific questions will help me to whether should I go ahead or not.

Thank You for your time in advance.

Regards,
Suresh

On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 at 16:09 Suresh Kanzariya <skanzariya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Sameer,

I have not build it yet, but before I started building and porting on 410 platform, I just want to make feasibility whether it is possible or not?, Because as I said earlier Qualcomm uses its own hypervisor that is QHEE, so just wanted to conform whether 2 hypervisor run simultaneous or not and if not what are the possible changes are required in xen hypervisor to make it run on 410 platform.

Also does anyone did it before as the earlier link i shared stats that Xen crashes on Qualcomm platform, but I don't find any information about the platform.

So It will be great if someone can spread more lights on this.

My specific questions are below.
1. does xen run on Qualcomm 410 platform? if not what are the reasons and if it can run what are the possible changes are required? 

It will be great if I get some more details on above questions so that I don't go in wrong direction.

Thank You for your time in advance.

Regards,
Suresh

On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 at 14:35 Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Sameer,

Please try to retain everyone in CC (or at least the author of the
e-mail). Otherwise the answer may be delayed. I have added back Suresh.

Regards,

On 02/11/2016 20:37, Goel, Sameer wrote:
>
> Can you please post the error and details on Xen you are using?
>
> Thanks,
> Sameer
> On 11/2/2016 3:04 AM, Suresh Kanzariya wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to run Xen on Qualcomm 410 platform.
>>
>> I have come across below link
>> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg03144.html
>>
>>
>> which suggest a patch to fix Xen crashes on Qualcomm Technology, So does
>> anyone has any information on the post support which Qualcomm Platform?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Suresh
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 at 11:48 Suresh Kanzariya <skanzariya@xxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:skanzariya@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Julien,
>>
>>     Thanks for the information. Let me get some more information on
>>     this, and I will get back to the mailing-list for further
>> information.
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     Suresh
>>
>>     On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx
>>     <mailto:julien.grall@xxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>         On 31/10/16 14:59, Suresh Kanzariya wrote:
>>
>>             Hi Julien,
>>
>>
>>         Hi,
>>
>>         It seems that I forgot to add xen-devel on CC in my answer.
>>         Sorry for that.
>>
>>             Thanks for the information.
>>
>>             Just wanted to understand that Qualcomm boot itself
>> contains a
>>             Hypervisor and also Xen is also a hypervisor, so I am not
>>             sure Xen
>>             hypervisor directly fits into the design, I guess Qualcomm
>>             hypervisor
>>             need modification or remove completely to support xen. It
>>             will be
>>             great if you can spread some light on this.
>>
>>
>>         Indeed 2 hypervisors cannot cooperate on the same processor. If
>>         Qualcomm provides any hypervisor, you would have to remove it.
>>
>>         Although, I don't know much this platform, so I would recommend
>>         to contact Qualcomm for anything regarding that.
>>
>>         Regards,
>>
>>         --
>>         Julien Grall
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Suresh
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>>
>

--
Julien Grall
--
Regards,
Suresh
--
Regards,
Suresh
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.