Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] docs: remove wrong statement about bug in xenstore

[Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 04:43:59PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 24/10/16 15:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>> On 24.10.16 at 15:29, <JGross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> --- a/docs/misc/xenstore.txt
> >> +++ b/docs/misc/xenstore.txt
> >> @@ -229,8 +229,10 @@ TRANSACTION_START     |                       
> >> <transid>|
> >>    tx_id request header field.  When transaction is started whole
> >>    db is copied; reads and writes happen on the copy.
> >>    It is not legal to send non-0 tx_id in TRANSACTION_START.
> >> -  Currently xenstored has the bug that after 2^32 transactions
> >> +  Currently oxenstored has the bug that after 2^32 transactions
> >>    it will allocate the transid 0 for an actual transaction.
> > 
> > While I know nothing about OCaml, I read Andrew's earlier reply
> > to mean different behavior would result than the one described,
> > namely differing between 32-bit and 64-bit builds.
> 
> Do we really still support 32 bit dom0? I thought the support has
> ended some time ago?

Yes, we still support that.

It is the support of 32 bit Xen that has ended.

Wei.

> 
> 
> Juergen

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel