Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: remove explicit rule for libxl_arm_acpi.o

[Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Wei Liu wrote:
> After 9c635883 ("ARM64: fix libxl build, do not include
> ../../xen/include") there is nothing special needed to build
> libxl_arm_acpi.o. Remove the explicit rule, use predefined one.
> 
> Build tested on ARM64.
> 
> Suggested-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>


> Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/libxl/Makefile | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/libxl/Makefile b/tools/libxl/Makefile
> index dac19ac..79e4019 100644
> --- a/tools/libxl/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/libxl/Makefile
> @@ -94,9 +94,6 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM_64),y)
>  LIBXL_OBJS-y += libxl_arm_acpi.o dsdt_anycpu_arm.o
>  dsdt_anycpu_arm.c:
>       $(MAKE) -C $(ACPI_PATH) ACPI_BUILD_DIR=$(CURDIR)
> -
> -libxl_arm_acpi.o: libxl_arm_acpi.c
> -     $(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) -o $@ libxl_arm_acpi.c
>  else
>  LIBXL_OBJS-$(CONFIG_ARM) += libxl_arm_no_acpi.o
>  endif
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel