|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/Intel: virtualize support for cpuid faulting
> :) I am now curious as to which bit I missed.
I made these changes.
- Kyle
---
tests/cpuid-faulting/main.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/cpuid-faulting/main.c b/tests/cpuid-faulting/main.c
index 3e782a2..221567d 100644
--- a/tests/cpuid-faulting/main.c
+++ b/tests/cpuid-faulting/main.c
@@ -37,36 +37,39 @@ bool ex_record_fault_ebx(struct cpu_regs *regs,
}
unsigned int stub_rdmsr(uint32_t idx, uint64_t *val)
{
unsigned int fault = 0;
uint32_t lo, hi;
*val = 0;
- asm volatile("1: rdmsr; 2:"
+ asm volatile("1: rdmsr;"
+ "xor %%ebx, %%ebx; 2:"
_ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLER(1b, 2b, ex_record_fault_ebx)
: "=a" (lo), "=d" (hi), "=&b" (fault)
: "c" (idx));
if ( !fault )
*val = (((uint64_t)hi) << 32) | lo;
return fault;
}
unsigned int stub_wrmsr(uint32_t idx, uint64_t val)
{
unsigned int fault = 0;
- asm volatile("1: rdmsr; 2:"
+ asm volatile("1: wrmsr;"
+ "xor %%ebx, %%ebx; 2:"
_ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLER(1b, 2b, ex_record_fault_ebx)
: "=&b" (fault)
: "c" (idx), "a" ((uint32_t)val),
- "d" ((uint32_t)(val >> 32)));
+ "d" ((uint32_t)(val >> 32))
+ : "memory");
return fault;
}
unsigned long stub_cpuid(void)
{
unsigned int fault = 0;
base-commit: 0342fd279b05d0c2e31c8418fcffcdc9e48eb42f
--
2.10.1
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |