[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86emul: correct {, F}CMOV and F{, U}COMI{, P} emulation

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:13:58 +0100
Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:14:09 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 13/10/16 07:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The FPU ones need to be executed with guest EFLAGS.{C,P,Z}F in context.
>
> We also can't exclude someone wanting to hide the feature from (32-bit)
> guests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86emul: correct {, F}CMOV and F{, U}COMI{, P} emulation
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer commit
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3 for 4.8] docs: feature documents for the schedulers
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86emul: correct {, F}CMOV and F{, U}COMI{, P} emulation
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 101401: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.