[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 08/15] x86/efi: create new early memory allocator
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 05:25:46AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 22.09.16 at 12:52, <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 03:42:09AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 20.09.16 at 20:45, <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:46:56AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >> >>> On 20.09.16 at 12:52, <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > [...] > > > >> >> > Do you suggest that I should move out of #ifndef CONFIG_ARM all > >> >> > ebmalloc > > stuff > >> >> > except free_ebmalloc_unused_mem(). Even if it is not used on ARM right > > now? > >> >> > >> >> That's not the static function, is it? The function you name should > >> >> actually be called on ARM too (as I did point out elsewhere already), > >> >> just to not leave a trap open for someone to fall into when (s)he > >> >> adds a first use of the allocator on ARM. > >> > > >> > Well, I think that sane person doing that would analyze how ebmalloc > >> > works > >> > on x86 and then move (align to ARM needs if required) all its machinery > >> > (including free_ebmalloc_unused_mem()) to run on ARM. At least I would do > >> > that. This way he/she would avoid issues mentioned by you. However, if > >> > you > >> > still prefer your way I can do that. Though I am not sure about the rest > >> > of > >> > ebmalloc stuff. Should I move it out of #ifndef CONFIG_ARM? Looking at > >> > your > >> > earlier replies I see that yes. Am I correct? > >> > >> Yes. > > > > This does not work because if I build Xen for ARM then I got: > > boot.c:589:21: error: 'ebmalloc' defined but not used > > [-Werror=unused-function] > > static void __init *ebmalloc(size_t size) > > Quote from an earlier reply of mine: > > Arguably the one static function may better be, as other > workarounds to avoid the "unused" compiler warning wouldn't > be any better. > > and then later > > You misunderstood - I said that for this one (unused) static > function such an #ifdef is probably okay, as the presumably > smallest possible workaround. > > I really have no idea what else to say. Sorry, however, sometimes it is very difficult to understand what are you referring to. If you could be more specific then I will be happy. Anyway, now it looks that you wish something like that: #ifndef CONFIG_ARM /* Whole x86 ebmalloc stuff. */ ... #else void __init free_ebmalloc_unused_mem(void) { } #endif and then call free_ebmalloc_unused_mem() from e.g. xen/arch/arm/setup.c:init_done(). Am I right? Daniel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |