[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 07/16] libxl/arm: Construct ACPI GTDT table
On 2016/8/30 2:16, Julien Grall wrote: > On 16/08/2016 06:25, Shannon Zhao wrote: >> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Construct GTDT table with the interrupt information of timers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> tools/libxl/libxl_arm_acpi.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm_acpi.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm_acpi.c >> index 8cd1d9b..28fb6fe 100644 >> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm_acpi.c >> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm_acpi.c >> @@ -24,10 +24,18 @@ typedef uint8_t u8; >> typedef uint16_t u16; >> typedef uint32_t u32; >> typedef uint64_t u64; >> +typedef int64_t s64; >> >> #include <acpi/acconfig.h> >> #include <acpi/actbl.h> >> >> +#include <asm-generic/bitsperlong.h> >> +#define ACPI_MACHINE_WIDTH __BITS_PER_LONG >> +#define COMPILER_DEPENDENT_INT64 int64_t >> +#define COMPILER_DEPENDENT_UINT64 uint64_t >> + >> +#include <acpi/actypes.h> >> + >> _hidden >> extern const unsigned char dsdt_anycpu_arm[]; >> _hidden >> @@ -175,6 +183,26 @@ static void make_acpi_xsdt(libxl__gc *gc, struct >> xc_dom_image *dom, >> acpitables[XSDT].size); >> } >> >> +static void make_acpi_gtdt(libxl__gc *gc, struct xc_dom_image *dom, >> + struct acpitable acpitables[]) >> +{ >> + uint64_t offset = acpitables[GTDT].addr - GUEST_ACPI_BASE; >> + struct acpi_table_gtdt *gtdt = (void *)dom->acpi_modules[0].data >> + offset; >> + >> + gtdt->non_secure_el1_interrupt = GUEST_TIMER_PHYS_NS_PPI; >> + gtdt->non_secure_el1_flags = >> + (ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE << >> ACPI_GTDT_INTERRUPT_MODE) >> + |(ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW << >> ACPI_GTDT_INTERRUPT_POLARITY); >> + gtdt->virtual_timer_interrupt = GUEST_TIMER_VIRT_PPI; >> + gtdt->virtual_timer_flags = >> + (ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE << >> ACPI_GTDT_INTERRUPT_MODE) >> + |(ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW << >> ACPI_GTDT_INTERRUPT_POLARITY); >> + > > I don't see any setting for the field counter_block_address. From the > ACPI spec, the field should be 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF when the counter > control block is not available Oops, will add. Thanks. -- Shannon _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |