[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 0/7] tools: add linker table userspace sandbox
- To: mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx, acme@xxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx, masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx, jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx, heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx, ananth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, anil.s.keshavamurthy@xxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, realmz6@xxxxxxxxx
- From: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 23:57:18 -0500
- Cc: gnomes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jkosina@xxxxxxx, benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, paulus@xxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, markus.heiser@xxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, msalter@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, fontana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx, keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx, arnd@xxxxxxxx, jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx, will.deacon@xxxxxxx, rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mcb30@xxxxxxxx, linux-kbuild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgross@xxxxxxxx, chris@xxxxxxxxxx, pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx, tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, ananth@xxxxxxxxxx, jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mmarek@xxxxxxxx, david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx, jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, korea.drzix@xxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 04:58:04 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 08/19/2016 04:41 PM, mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Please let me know if there are any issue or questions.
Only that this has been the majority of the traffic on the linux-sh
mailing list for over a month and I'm still not sure why anyone should care.
I have no idea what problem it solves, despite reading a couple dozen
messages in the thread, and the most recent two 0/x intro messages. Its
purpose seems to be ensuring that lld.llvm.org has more work to do if it
ever wants to build the kernel without binutils?
I also am not certain why every revision of it is cc'd to linux-sh. Is
it generic linker infrastructure change, or is it something that affects
this architecture specifically? As far as I can tell nothing in this
most recent 7-patch series touches arch/sh at all, you just cc'd our
list because you think the work you're doing is _important_, not that
it's specifically relevant to us.
Rob
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
