[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/24] xen: credit1: fix mask to be used for tickling in Credit1
If there are idle pcpus inside the waking vcpu's soft-affinity mask, we should really tickle one of them (this is one of the purposes of the __runq_tickle() function itself!), not just any idle pcpu. The issue has been introduced in 02ea5031825d ("credit1: properly deal with pCPUs not in any cpupool"), where the usage of idle_mask is changed, without updating the bottom of the function, where it is also referenced. Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> --- David, a while ago you asked what could have been that was causing awful results for Credit1, for CPU bound workloads, in the overloaded scenario of one of my benchmarks. I think the bug fixed either here or in next patch (but I'd be rather sure it's this one) is where the problem was. :-) --- xen/common/sched_credit.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/common/sched_credit.c b/xen/common/sched_credit.c index 6eccf09..3d4f223 100644 --- a/xen/common/sched_credit.c +++ b/xen/common/sched_credit.c @@ -454,11 +454,12 @@ static inline void __runq_tickle(struct csched_vcpu *new) if ( opt_tickle_one_idle ) { this_cpu(last_tickle_cpu) = - cpumask_cycle(this_cpu(last_tickle_cpu), &idle_mask); + cpumask_cycle(this_cpu(last_tickle_cpu), + cpumask_scratch_cpu(cpu)); __cpumask_set_cpu(this_cpu(last_tickle_cpu), &mask); } else - cpumask_or(&mask, &mask, &idle_mask); + cpumask_or(&mask, &mask, cpumask_scratch_cpu(cpu)); } /* Did we find anyone? */ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |