[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] xen: Have schedulers revise initial placement
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 07:24 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > I'd really like to have those backported, but I have to ask one > of you to identify which prereq-s are needed on 4.6 and 4.5 > (I'll revert them from 4.5 right away, but I'll wait for an osstest > flight to confirm the same issue exists on 4.6). > Hey, I could only start working on this this morning (sorry for the delay), and I'll continue tomorrow but, at least here, staging-4.6 (plus the patches!) crashes like this: (XEN) [ 0.000000] ----[ Xen-4.6.4-pre x86_64 debug=y Not tainted ]---- (XEN) [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 (XEN) [ 0.000000] RIP: e008:[<ffff82d0801238c4>] _csched_cpu_pick+0x156/0x612 (XEN) [ 0.000000] RFLAGS: 0000000000010046 CONTEXT: hypervisor (XEN) [ 0.000000] rax: 0000000000000040 rbx: 0000000000000040 rcx: 0000000000000000 (XEN) [ 0.000000] rdx: 000000000000003f rsi: 0000000000000040 rdi: 0000000000000040 (XEN) [ 0.000000] rbp: ffff82d0802f7d68 rsp: ffff82d0802f7c78 r8: 0000000000000000 (XEN) [ 0.000000] r9: 0000000000000001 r10: 0000000000000001 r11: 00000000000000b4 (XEN) [ 0.000000] r12: 0000000000000040 r13: ffff83032152bf40 r14: ffff82d08033ae40 (XEN) [ 0.000000] r15: ffff8300dbdf4000 cr0: 0000000080050033 cr4: 00000000000006e0 (XEN) [ 0.000000] cr3: 00000000dba9f000 cr2: 0000000000000000 (XEN) [ 0.000000] ds: 0000 es: 0000 fs: 0000 gs: 0000 ss: 0000 cs: e008 (XEN) [ 0.000000] Xen stack trace from rsp=ffff82d0802f7c78: (XEN) [ 0.000000] 0000000000000046 0000000200000092 ffff82d08033ae48 ffff82d08028b020 (XEN) [ 0.000000] 0000000000000000 ffff82d0802ff040 0000000100000001 ffff82d08033ae40 (XEN) [ 0.000000] 0000000000000097 ffff82d0802f7cd8 0000000000000006 ffff82d0802f7ce8 (XEN) [ 0.000000] ffff82d08012d027 ffff830321532000 ffff82d0802f7d28 ffff82d08013c779 (XEN) [ 0.000000] 0000000000000000 0000000000000010 0000000000000048 0000000000000048 (XEN) [ 0.000000] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 (XEN) [ 0.000000] ffff82d0802f7d78 ffff8300dbdf4000 ffff83032152a000 ffff83032152bf40 (XEN) [ 0.000000] 0000000000000000 ffff82d08028e020 ffff82d0802f7d78 ffff82d080123d8e (XEN) [ 0.000000] ffff82d0802f7db8 ffff82d080123db0 ffff83032152a000 ffff8300dbdf4000 (XEN) [ 0.000000] ffff83032152a000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff82d08028e020 (XEN) [ 0.000000] ffff82d0802f7de8 ffff82d080129e8d ffff82d0802f7de8 ffff82d08013cda0 (XEN) [ 0.000000] ffff8300dbdf4000 ffff83032152a000 ffff82d0802f7e18 ffff82d080105f59 (XEN) [ 0.000000] ffff82d0802a1720 ffff82d0802a1718 ffff82d0802a1720 ffff82d0802daa60 (XEN) [ 0.000000] ffff82d0802f7e48 ffff82d0802a8145 0000000000000002 ffff83032152b610 (XEN) [ 0.000000] 0000000000000002 0000000000000001 ffff82d0802f7f08 ffff82d0802c5c6f (XEN) [ 0.000000] 0000000000000000 0000000000100000 00000000014ae000 0000000000324000 (XEN) [ 0.000000] 0080016300000000 0000000300000015 0000000000000000 0000000000000010 (XEN) [ 0.000000] ffff83000008dd50 ffff83000008df20 0000000000000002 ffff83000008dfb0 (XEN) [ 0.000000] 0000000800000000 000000010000006e 0000000000000003 00000000000002f8 (XEN) [ 0.000000] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 (XEN) [ 0.000000] Xen call trace: (XEN) [ 0.000000] [<ffff82d0801238c4>] _csched_cpu_pick+0x156/0x612 (XEN) [ 0.000000] [<ffff82d080123d8e>] csched_cpu_pick+0xe/0x10 (XEN) [ 0.000000] [<ffff82d080123db0>] csched_vcpu_insert+0x20/0x145 (XEN) [ 0.000000] [<ffff82d080129e8d>] sched_init_vcpu+0x1d1/0x218 (XEN) [ 0.000000] [<ffff82d080105f59>] alloc_vcpu+0x1ba/0x2a4 (XEN) [ 0.000000] [<ffff82d0802a8145>] scheduler_init+0x1b0/0x271 (XEN) [ 0.000000] [<ffff82d0802c5c6f>] __start_xen+0x1f85/0x2550 (XEN) [ 0.000000] [<ffff82d080100073>] __high_start+0x53/0x55 (XEN) [ 0.000000] (XEN) [ 0.000000] (XEN) [ 0.000000] **************************************** (XEN) [ 0.000000] Panic on CPU 0: (XEN) [ 0.000000] Assertion 'cpu < nr_cpu_ids' failed at ...e/SOURCES/xen/xen.git/xen/include/xen/cpumask.h:97 Which, I think needs at least this hunk (from 6b53bb4ab3c9 "sched: better handle (not) inserting idle vCPUs in runqueues"): diff --git a/xen/common/schedule.c b/xen/common/schedule.c index 2beebe8..fddcd52 100644 --- a/xen/common/schedule.c +++ b/xen/common/schedule.c @@ -240,20 +240,22 @@ int sched_init_vcpu(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int processor) init_timer(&v->poll_timer, poll_timer_fn, v, v->processor); - /* Idle VCPUs are scheduled immediately. */ + v->sched_priv = SCHED_OP(DOM2OP(d), alloc_vdata, v, d->sched_priv); + if ( v->sched_priv == NULL ) + return 1; + + TRACE_2D(TRC_SCHED_DOM_ADD, v->domain->domain_id, v->vcpu_id); + + /* Idle VCPUs are scheduled immediately, so don't put them in runqueue. */ if ( is_idle_domain(d) ) { per_cpu(schedule_data, v->processor).curr = v; v->is_running = 1; } - - TRACE_2D(TRC_SCHED_DOM_ADD, v->domain->domain_id, v->vcpu_id); - - v->sched_priv = SCHED_OP(DOM2OP(d), alloc_vdata, v, d->sched_priv); - if ( v->sched_priv == NULL ) - return 1; - - SCHED_OP(DOM2OP(d), insert_vcpu, v); + else + { + SCHED_OP(DOM2OP(d), insert_vcpu, v); + } return 0; } So, yeah, it's proving a little more complicated than how I thought it would have, just by looking at the patches. :-/ Will let know. Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |