[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 11/25] arm/altp2m: Add HVMOP_altp2m_destroy_p2m.
On 06/08/2016 10:54, Sergej Proskurin wrote: Hi Julien, Hello Sergej, On 08/04/2016 01:46 PM, Julien Grall wrote:Hello Sergej, On 01/08/16 18:10, Sergej Proskurin wrote:Signed-off-by: Sergej Proskurin <proskurin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> --- v2: Substituted the call to tlb_flush for p2m_flush_table. Added comments. Cosmetic fixes. --- xen/arch/arm/altp2m.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ xen/arch/arm/hvm.c | 2 +- xen/include/asm-arm/altp2m.h | 4 ++++ 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/altp2m.c b/xen/arch/arm/altp2m.c index c22d2e4..80ed553 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/altp2m.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/altp2m.c [...] + + p2m_flush_table(p2m); + + /* + * Reset VTTBR. + * + * Note that VMID is not freed so that it can be reused later. + */ + p2m->vttbr.vttbr = INVALID_VTTBR; + d->arch.altp2m_vttbr[idx] = INVALID_VTTBR; + + read_unlock(&p2m->lock);Why did you decide to reset the p2m rather than free it? The code would be simpler with the latter.* First, to be as similar to the x86 implementation as possible. * Second, simply to reuse already allocated p2m's without additional overhead. I don't really buy those arguments. The x86 implementation may not fit the ARM model. Initializing a p2m on ARM is very quick: allocating the p2m and the root pages (up to 2 page). So the overhead is really minimal. Therefore, I don't see any reason to introduce complex bookkeeping when NULL can be used for the same purpose. Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |