[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 2/4] tools: split out xenstored starting form xencommons
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 01:20:40PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 02/08/16 13:13, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 12:39:26PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > >> In order to prepare starting a xenstore domain split out the starting > >> of the xenstore daemon from the xencommons script into a dedicated > >> launch-xenstore script. > >> > >> Correct one error: don't remove old tdb files in background, as this > >> could lead to very subtle races. > >> > > > > Sorry to only notice this now -- I suppose this shouldn't be in commit > > message because it is a changelog for different revision of your patch, > > or you need to describe what the race is if there is really such issue > > -- and that's a potential backport candidate. > > - rm -f "$XENSTORED_ROOTDIR"/tdb* &>/dev/null > ... > + rm -f "$XENSTORED_ROOTDIR"/tdb* 2>/dev/null > > Please note the "&" in the removed line. And the description just tells > you that: the file shouldn't be removed in the background. How else > would you describe it? > > And the race should be obvious: removing a file in the background which > is going to be used by the next command is racy. > > > As far as I can tell this is pure code motion and shouldn't have any > > change in behaviour. Hence this line in commit message makes me feel a > > bit confused. > > Still confused? Ah, the 2> vs &> thing is really subtle. I missed that, sorry. I think you need to separate that one change out so that we can backport it to stable releases to avoid the race. Wei. > > > Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |