[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] xen-scsiback: One function call less in scsiback_device_action() after error detection



>> @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static void scsiback_device_action(struct vscsibk_pend 
>> *pending_req,
>>      tmr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct scsiback_tmr), GFP_KERNEL);
>>      if (!tmr) {
>>              target_put_sess_cmd(se_cmd);
>> -            goto err;
>> +            goto do_resp;
>>      }
> 
> Hmm, I'm not convinced this is an improvement.
> 
> I'd rather rename the new error label to "put_cmd" and get rid of the
> braces in above if statement:
> 
> -     if (!tmr) {
> -             target_put_sess_cmd(se_cmd);
> -             goto err;
> -     }
> +     if (!tmr)
> +             goto put_cmd;
> 
> and then in the error path:
> 
> -err:
> +put_cmd:
> +     target_put_sess_cmd(se_cmd);

I am unsure on the relevance of this function on such a source position.
Would it make sense to move it further down at the end?


> +free_tmr:
>       kfree(tmr);

How do you think about to skip this function call after a memory
allocation failure?

Regards,
Markus

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.