Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 16/17] libxc/xc_dom_arm: Copy ACPI tables to guest space

[Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:42:07PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> >>>>> > >> > 
> >>>>> > >> > Does it mean we would need to update the slack to take into 
> >>>>> > >> > account the ACPI
> >>>>> > >> > blob?
> >>> > > Yes, we need to take into account the ACPI blob. Probably not in the
> >>> > > slack but directly in mam_memkb.
> >> > Sorry, I'm not sure understand this. I found the b_info->max_memkb but
> >> > didn't find the slack you said. And how to fix this? Update
> >> > b_info->max_memkb or the slack?
> > Can you calculate the size of your payload and add that to max_memkb?
> > 
> Yeah, but the size will be changed if we change the tables in the future
> and this also should consider x86, right?

That could easily be solved by introducing a function to calculate the
size, right?

Wei.

> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Shannon

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel