Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 07/07/16 14:59, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was 
> Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"):
>> On 07/07/16 12:10, Lars Kurth wrote:
>>> @Andrew: would something like test/xtf.git work
> I would live with that.
>
>> It would, although given a straight choice I would prefer
>> xen-test-framework.git over its abbreviation.
> This conversation is in danger of going round in circles.

Right - let me draw a line in the sand.

The current name is xen-test-framework, and that has been around and
used for several years now.  XTF is also used frequently as an abbreviation.

A concern has been raised about the correctness of this name, but no
alternatives have been suggested which come close to being a plausible
replacement.  (All suggestions are less accurate or descriptive than the
current name).

As the author, I chose the current name, and chose it as the most
appropriate name I could think of.  If others feel strongly that it
isn't, then the onus is on them to choose a specific alternative and
argue as to why it is more appropriate.  Nothing along this line has
occurred.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel